πŸ€– BINDER: Instantly Adaptive Mobile Manipulation with Open-Vocabulary Commands

ICRA 2026

Seoul National University
* equally contributed to this work

Abstract

Current open-vocabulary mobile manipulation (OVMM) systems update their world representation only at discrete points, leaving robots blind to environmental changes between updates. We propose BINDER, a dual-process framework that combines a Deliberative Response Module (DRM) for strategic planning with an Instant Response Module (IRM) for continuous video-stream monitoring. This enables robots to detect changes immediately and trigger on-demand replanning, achieving substantially higher success rates in dynamic real-world environments.
MOTIVATION

The Temporal Blindness Problem

Why do current OVMM systems fail in dynamic environments?

Current OVMM systems rely on 3D semantic scene reconstruction to maintain their world representation. However, this process is computationally expensive (10-30 seconds per update), forcing robots to update only at discrete points. Between these updates, robots are effectively blind to any environmental changes.

A robot tasked with finding and grasping a banana while navigating from pβ‚€ to p₁

(a) Sparse Updates

e.g., OK-Robot, DovSG

Refresh perception only upon arriving at navigation targets. If the banana appears along the path between pβ‚€ and p₁, the robot completely misses it because it never "looks" during traversal.

(b) Frequent Updates

e.g., DynaMem

Insert intermediate waypoints for 3D reconstruction. This slows execution with repeated pauses and still leaves blind spots between checkpoints where objects can be missed.

(c) BINDER (Ours)

Continuous + On-demand

Maintain continuous visual awareness via lightweight video-stream monitoring while in motion. Trigger on-demand 3D updates only when significant changes are detected.

Key Insight: Not all perception tasks demand the same computational cost. Detecting environmental changes can be handled through lightweight video analysis, while precise 3D geometry is only needed at critical decision points. By separating the two, BINDER resolves the trade-off between continuous awareness and costly updates.

METHOD

Dual-Process Reasoning in BINDER

Two modules coordinating bidirectionally throughout task execution

DRM (Deliberative Response Module) handles strategic planning and tells IRM what to monitor, while IRM (Instant Response Module) provides continuous video-stream monitoring and reports significant events back to DRM. This bidirectional coordination enables continuous awareness via lightweight monitoring, with expensive 3D reconstruction triggered only when needed.

Task: "Place the black toy on the bookshelf and the banana on the yellow plate"

DRM (Strategic Planner)

Multimodal LLM that decides high-level actions (explore, goto, grasp) and generates guidance prompts telling IRM what to monitor for each phase.

IRM (Continuous Monitor)

Video-LLM that processes camera streams (1-second clips) and produces structured reports determining execution mode based on DRM's guidance.

Execution loop (a) and shared memory (b)

Execution Loop

The outer loop iterates until task completion. At each step, DRM decides the next action and guidance prompt. While the robot executes, IRM monitors continuously and determines one of three execution modes:

CONTINUE

Nothing detected β†’ keep going

ADJUST

Local correction without stopping

REPLAN

Stop, 3D update, new plan

Shared Memory

3D Voxel Map β€” Semantic scene, updated at nav targets or REPLAN

2D Occupancy Map β€” Top-down projection for path planning

Action History β€” Log of executed actions for context

Object Registry β€” Discovered objects with 3D positions, populated by both modules

Phase-Specific Behavior

The guidance prompt from DRM configures IRM's monitoring focus and response criteria for each task phase:

During Navigation

IRM monitors for task-relevant objects appearing in the scene. If a target object is spotted mid-path β†’ REPLAN triggers immediate 3D update and plan revision to grasp the object.

During Manipulation

IRM monitors grasp feasibility and execution quality. Pose misalignment β†’ ADJUST regenerates candidates locally. Critical failures (repeated fails, unavailable receptacle) β†’ REPLAN.

RESULTS

Office Environment Evaluation

For more details, please check out the paper.

Task complexity scales from 1 to 3 pick-and-place subtasks. 40 trials per task with dynamic perturbations applied during execution.

BINDER achieves 93% success rate on single-subtask and 63% on three-subtask scenarios, compared to the strongest baseline DynaMem's 60% and 15% respectively. The gap widens with task complexity as baseline methods suffer from compounding failures.

SR (Success Rate) β€” Full task completion  |  PSR (Partial SR) β€” Fraction of subtasks completed  |  SPL β€” Success weighted by path efficiency  |  PSPL β€” Partial success weighted by path efficiency

BibTeX

@inproceedings{choASCKC26,
  author    = {Cho, Seongwon and Ahn, Daechul and Shin, Donghyun and Choi, Hyeonbeom and Kim, San and Choi, Jonghyun},
  title     = {BINDER: Instantly Adaptive Mobile Manipulation with Open-Vocabulary Commands},
  booktitle = {ICRA},
  year      = {2026},
}